Daily

Random

Practice set

Baltic Way 1996 · Problem 20

Combinatorics

Is it possible to partition all positive integers into disjoint sets AA and BB such that

(i) no three numbers of AA form arithmetic progression,

(ii) no infinite non-constant arithmetic progression can be formed by numbers of BB ?

Change pool

When you’re ready

Review material becomes available with the next Daily.

Review

Topics

Colorings and configurations · Pigeonhole and extremal arguments · Induction and recursion

Solutions

Solution

Solution:

Let N\mathbb{N} denote the set of positive integers. There is a bijective function f:N→N×Nf: \mathbb{N} \rightarrow \mathbb{N} \times \mathbb{N}. Let a0=1a_{0}=1, and for k≥1k \geq 1, let aka_{k} be the least integer of the form m+tnm+t n for some integer t≥0t \geq 0 where f(k)=(m,n)f(k)=(m, n), such that ak≥2ak−1a_{k} \geq 2 a_{k-1}. Let A={a0,a1,…}A=\left\{a_{0}, a_{1}, \ldots\right\} and let B=N\AB=\mathbb{N} \backslash A. We now show that AA and BB satisfy the given conditions.

(i) For any non-negative integers i<j<ki<j<k, we have ak≥aj+1≥2aja_{k} \geq a_{j+1} \geq 2 a_{j}, and hence ak−aj≥aj>aj−aia_{k}-a_{j} \geq a_{j}>a_{j}-a_{i}. Thus ai,aja_{i}, a_{j} and aka_{k} do not form an arithmetic progression, since this would mean that ak−aj=aj−aia_{k}-a_{j}=a_{j}-a_{i}. Hence no three numbers in AA form an arithmetic progression.

(ii) Consider an infinite arithmetic progression m,m+n,m+2n,…m, m+n, m+2 n, \ldots, with m,n∈Nm, n \in \mathbb{N}. Then m+nt=akm+n t=a_{k} for some integer t≥0t \geq 0, where k=f−1(m,n)k=f^{-1}(m, n). Thus aka_{k} belongs to the arithmetic progression, but ak∉Ba_{k} \notin B. Hence BB does not contain any infinite non-constant arithmetic progression.

Contest context

Results from Baltic Way 1996

10 teams

Mean score
2.4 / 5
Scores of 4 or 5
5 / 10
Estonia
0 / 5

Score distribution

05
10
20
30
41
54
All team scores
TeamScore
Poland5 / 5
Latvia5 / 5
Sweden5 / 5
Denmark0 / 5
St. Petersburg0 / 5
Finland0 / 5
Norway4 / 5
Lithuania0 / 5
Estonia0 / 5
Iceland5 / 5